Communications in Information and Systems

Volume 21 (2021)

Number 2

Order effects of measurements in multi-agent hypothesis testing

Pages: 173 – 208

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4310/CIS.2021.v21.n2.a1

Authors

John S. Baras (Institute of Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Md., U.S.A.)

Aneesh Raghavan (Institute of Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Md., U.S.A.)

Abstract

In multi-agent systems, agents observe data, and use them to make inferences and take actions. As a result sensing and control naturally interfere, more so from a real-time perspective. A natural consequence is that in multi-agent systems there are propositions based on the set of observed events that might not be simultaneously verifiable, which leads to the need for probability structures that allow such incompatible events. We revisit the structure of events in a multi-agent system and we introduce the necessary new models that incorporate such incompatible events in the formalism. These models are essential for building non-commutative probability models, which are different than the classical models based on the Kolmogorov construction. From this perspective, we revisit the concepts of event-state-operation structure and the needed relationship of incompatibility from the literature and use them as a tool to study the needed new algebraic structure of the set of events. We present an example from multi-agent hypothesis testing where the set of events does not form a Boolean algebra, but forms an ortholattice. A possible construction of a ‘noncommutative probability space’, accounting for incompatible events is discussed. We formulate and solve the binary hypothesis testing problem in the noncommutative probability space. We illustrate the occurrence of ‘order effects’ in the multi-agent hypothesis testing problem by computing the minimum probability of error that can be achieved with different orders of measurements.

The full text of this article is unavailable through your IP address: 35.175.191.36

The authors’ research was supported by ARO grant W911NF-15-1-0646, by DARPA through ARO grant W911NF-14- 1-0384 and by ONR grant N00014-17-1-2622.

Received 26 May 2020

Published 3 June 2021