Communications in Mathematical Sciences

Volume 16 (2018)

Number 5

Error estimates of finite difference time domain methods for the Klein–Gordon–Dirac system in the nonrelativistic limit regime

Pages: 1325 – 1346

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4310/CMS.2018.v16.n5.a7

Authors

Yong-Yong Cai (Beijing Computational Science Research Center, Beijing, China)

Wenfan Yi (Beijing Computational Science Research Center, Beijing, China; and Key Laboratory of HPC & SIP (MOE of China), Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan, China)

Abstract

In this paper, we establish error estimates of finite difference time domain (FDTD) methods for the Klein–Gordon–Dirac (KGD) system in the nonrelativistic limit regime, involving a small dimensionless parameter $0 \lt \varepsilon \ll 1$ inversely proportional to the speed of light. In this limit regime, the solution of the KGD system propagates waves with $O(\varepsilon^2)$ and $O(1)$-wavelength in time and space respectively. The high oscillation and the nonlinear coupling between the real scalar Klein–Gordon field and the complex Dirac vector field bring great challenges to the analysis of the numerical methods for the KGD system in the nonrelativistic limit regime. Four implicit/semi-implicit/explicit FDTD methods are rigorously analyzed. By applying the energy method and cut-off technique, we obtain the error bounds for the FDTD methods at $O(\tau^2 / \varepsilon^6 + h^2 / \varepsilon)$ with time step $\tau$ and mesh size $h$. Thus, in order to compute ‘correct’ solutions when $0\lt \varepsilon \ll 1$, the estimates suggest that the meshing strategy requirement of the FDTD methods is $\tau = O(\varepsilon^3)$ and $h=O(\sqrt{\varepsilon})$. In addition, numerical results are reported to support our conclusions. Our approach is valid in one, two and three dimensions.

Keywords

Klein–Gordon–Dirac system, nonrelativistic limit regime, Yukawa interaction, finite difference time domain (FDTD) methods, error estimates

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification

35Q55, 65N12, 81Q05

Received 16 February 2018

Received revised 8 June 2018

Accepted 8 June 2018

Published 19 December 2018